Are You a Useful Idiot?

Hard Times Require Hard Questions and Answers

Jan 13, 2026

So let me get this straight my Based Right Wing Frens. You deplore the American ZOG machine and Organized World Jewry that has near full spectrum dominance over the US Government but suddenly, because Delta Force was able to capture a President of a South American country by making a deal or bribing functionaries within the Venezuelan government to obtain him that this is somehow a win for the Trump Admin, MAGA, and the American people?

If someone questions you on this, you’re response is “How does this benefit Israel? Israel doesn’t give a shit about Venezuela. Not everything is about the Jews man.” First of all you’re not answering the question, but most importantly Israel is highly concerned with Central and South America.

I have yet to hear one of the defenders of the Venezuela operation bring up the Isaac Accords; this is for two reasons. One: they don’t know it exists. Two: it exposes the nonsense of “Israel doesn’t care about Venezuela.”

The Isaac Accords are an extension of the Abraham Accords, which establish a “normalization” of relations between Israel and some nations in the Arab world.

In signing these agreements, the United States, the UAE, Bahrain, and Israel, shortly followed by Kosovo, Sudan, and Morocco, signaled a new era of warm peace and prosperity with unlimited economic opportunities.
The Accords provide the pathway to the end of the Arab-Israeli conflict and a future of peace, tolerance, and opportunity in the Middle East and around the world. They also represent a new regional chapter with a shared vision for economic prosperity. As commercial ties grow, so will the strength of the bonds between the countries and their people. With limitless opportunity, the Abraham Accords could create as much as 4 million new jobs and $1 trillion in new economic activity in the coming decade and in the near term helping the region recover from the global pandemic.1

The Isaac Accords are a continuation of the Pax Judaica movement to Central and South America. Journalist Jose Nino states the following detailing the purpose of the Isaac Accords.

For Israeli officials, the rollout of the Isaac Accords is a sigh of relief, given Latin America’s growing hostility toward Israel since October 7. Multiple governments across the region, most notably Colombia in recent years, have downgraded ties with Israel or recalled ambassadors as public outrage over Israel’s genocide in Gaza has grown, while Israel has faced deeper isolation across parts of the Global South.
Genesis Prize Foundation Chairman Stan Polovets articulated the initiative’s ambitions at the June ceremony in Jerusalem. “We must end Israel’s isolation on the world stage,” Polovets said. “Together with President Milei, we will start in Latin America and help make his dream of Isaac Accords a reality. Milei’s support is not only symbolic. His Isaac Accords vision is a geopolitical strategy that can bring tangible results in Latin America.”
The initiative operates on a phased approach. Argentina, Costa Rica, Panama and Uruguay form the initial partnership group, with focus on immediate trade deals and security agreements. Phase Two targets Brazil, Chile, Colombia and El Salvador for expansion in 2026 and beyond, aiming to pull these nations back toward Israel despite recent diplomatic tensions.2

One potential reason for this expansion is domestic. The state of Israel is highly concerned with their internal political problems, which have become a powder keg. Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews have increasingly become more agitated by the domination and policies of Ashkenazi Jews and the long reign of the Likud Party. The lack of representation on political affairs along with the Likud Parties highly aggressive foreign policy have greatly alienated large segments of the Israeli population.345Having friendly South or Central American countries that Jews could migrate too maybe necessary if the domestic situation deteriorates. The recent “burnings” in Argentina by apparent IDF personnel maybe tied into this. 6

Israel has also alienated most of the world geopolitically due to the Likud Parties commitment to the Greater Israel project that was laid out in the Clean Break document. Aggression on other populations has always been at the heart of the State of Israel, during its formation and once it became a recognized state.78 Clean Break was designed by arch Zionists/Neoconservatives (these are really synonymous) Richard Pearl, Douglass Feith, & David Wurmser among others in 1996. Its a running joke in many parts of the world that American foreign policy in recent decades (explicitly since Clinton) has been for the benefit of the state of Israel. The recommendations of Clean Break accomplished the following and much more:

But the authors of A Clean Break have had dramatic success in shaping foreign policy to their conceptualization.
The following conclusions can be drawn with considerable confidence:
1. The Middle East policies driving the American government’s Middle East policy are delineated in the document, A Clean Break, and are are only partially congruent with the attitudes of the President. Much of the program of this document has already become reality and has eclipsed President Bush’s Roadmap which embodied a two state solution.
2. The authors of A Clean Break, those driving American policy, derive their concepts based on Israeli security and Israeli interest so that American foreign policy under the Bush administration is primarily serving the interest of Israel and secondarily that of the United States.
3. The invasion of Iraq for the purpose of overthrowing Saddam Hussein was undertaken for the interest of Israel though paid for with American capital and with American and Iraqi lives. David Kay, chief US weapons inspector in Iraq states that Iraq almost certainly possessed no weapons of mass destruction on the eve of the American invasion of Iraq destroyed any justification for the claim that Iraq posed an immediate threat to the United States.9

Israel was the main benefactor of GWOT. The more recent toppling of regimes in Libya and Syria along with the constant aggression against Yemen, Iran, Lebanon, the arch nemesis since Israel’s inception Egypt and of course the gradual extermination of Palestinians from Gaza are a continuation of the Greater Israel project and Clean Break. The belligerence has become so obvious that domestically in the US the Jewish Question has to be staged-managed and slow-rolled out to the public.

“The Israeli government has signed contracts worth millions of dollars in recent months to rehabilitate Israel’s standing in American public opinion, both online and offline. Amid a sharp drop in support from the conservative right, Israel has hired firms to conduct not just “hasbara [public diplomacy] campaigns” but also campaigns targeting millions of Christian churchgoers, bot networks to amplify pro-Israel messages online, and efforts to influence both search results and the responses given by popular AI services like ChatGPT.” 10

Supporters of the Maduro kidnapping also fail to address that Venezuela has been a thorn in the side of Zionism for decades. Both Hugo Chavez and Nicholas Maduro have minced no words and taken action against Zionism, as Jose Nino addresses.

These allegations of a Zionist conspiracy to destabilize Venezuela build on a longer history of Venezuelan hostility toward Israel that accelerated under the late-Hugo Chavez and continued under Maduro’s leadership. The deterioration began during the Second Intifada when Chavez sponsored rallies supporting Palestinians. The first direct targeting of Venezuela’s Jewish community occurred in May 2004 when the Sephardic Tiferet Israel Synagogue in Caracas was attacked following a government-backed pro-Palestinian rally.
The situation escalated dramatically during the 2006 Lebanon War. Chavez accused Israel of carrying out genocide and in August 2006 recalled Venezuela’s ambassador from Israel. “Israel has gone mad. They are massacring children, and no one knows how many are buried,” Chavez declared at the time.
Venezuela’s complete break with Israel came on January 14, 2009, during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza. Chavez described Israel’s military offensive as a “cruel persecution of the Palestinian people, directed by Israeli authorities.” The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry announced the severance of diplomatic ties, stating the move was made “given the inhumane persecution of the Palestinian people carried out by the authorities of Israel.”
Following this diplomatic rupture, Venezuela officially recognized Palestine on April 27, 2009, becoming the first country in the Americas to establish formal diplomatic relations with the Palestinian Authority.
While Rodriguez blamed Zionist machinations for the American operation, leading Israeli officials openly celebrated Maduro’s capture as a strategic victory that would weaken Iran’s hemispheric network. As this author has previously noted, Venezuela’s strategic alliance with Iran has drawn sharp criticism from policymakers in Washington and Tel Aviv, serving as justification for various regime change operations and destabilization tactics targeting the South American country.11

Sorry to burst your bubble BASED Fren but this operation has very much to do with Israel. Attempting to force the hand of the existing Maduro regime by the threat of capture or worse is the new and crude optics of NeoCon diplomacy. While the loss of life maybe mitigated; the negative blow-back will still be felt, time will tell how this plays out.

Other Copes

Oil: Venezuelan oil is sludge and incredibly difficult and time consuming to refine. It’s already been admitted it’s going to take years to develop the infrastructure necessary to cultivate the oil. Chevron has already developed facilities to do this in years past by playing ball with Hugo Chavez’s nationalization programs, so America already had access to the oil but that has been hampered with harsh sanctions over the years. 1213

“Experts warn that returning to even modest levels of production would require upgrading Venezuela’s aging infrastructure, a process that would require massive investment and political stability — conditions that have eluded Caracas for years and seem unlikely to materialize anytime soon. “There is no realistic prospect of immediately increasing Venezuela’s crude output,” Gus Vasquez, the head of oil pricing in the Americas for commodity markets analyst Argus Media, wrote in an emailed statement. “Venezuelan oil infrastructure would take years and possibly hundreds of billions to bring up to something close to its former capacity. Repairing refineries would be even harder.”14

Through legal malfeasance, CITGO is now under the majority control of Vulture Capitalist & Arch Zionist Paul Singer and CITGO appears to have rights to setup shop in Venezuela.15 With Singer’s background, if you think the American taxpayer is going to see benefits in lower gas prices once the oil is finally refined in years time I have oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you. The reports below gives you an idea of the type of person Paul Singer is.

One of Singer’s most recent controversial business deals involves Venezuela’s Citgo Petroleum. In November 2025, Elliott Investment Management won a court-mandated auction to purchase Citgo for $5.9 billion. Citgo represents the crown jewel of Venezuela’s international oil assets, owning three major Gulf Coast refineries with capacity to process 800,000 barrels per day, 43 oil terminals, and over 4,000 gas stations.
Singer acquired Citgo at what multiple sources describe as a major discount. Court advisors estimated Citgo’s actual value at approximately $13 billion, while Venezuelan officials valued the assets at $18 billion to $20 billion. This means Singer paid roughly 45 percent of the estimated market value.
A highly controversial aspect of the sale involves Robert Pincus, the court-appointed special master who oversaw the auction and recommended Singer’s bid. Pincus sits on the national board of directors of AIPAC. Gold Reserve Inc., a competing bidder that offered $7.9 billion, filed motions to disqualify Pincus for conflicts of interest. Venezuela rejected the sale’s legitimacy, calling it a “fraudulent process” and the “theft of the century.”16

The Monroe Doctrine: This is a classic case of starting the story in the middle. The fallback from defenders of the operation is that Russia, Iran, and China have developed levels of interdependence with Venezuela and the US cannot allow a foreign power encroaching on its hemisphere of direct influence. If that was the whole story I would agree with you but its not. The very reason Venezuela has turned to these other powers is because of decades of harsh treatment by US administrations. Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson supports this sentiment.

“Washington had close ties with Caracas before the late Hugo Chavez took office in 1999. The term “close ties” in this context should be interpreted as the US having effective control over the country and exploiting it. President Chavez put a stop to this, soon becoming a legend among hundreds of millions of Latin Americans and many other nationalists around the world; in effect uniting Left and Right Nationalists. By 2002, Washington organized a coup against the legitimately elected government in Caracas, but this failed miserably.
Chavez was subjected to numerous assassination attempts, failed coups, sanctions and other forms of pressure designed to make Venezuela’s life as miserable as possible. This didn’t change until Chavez’s untimely death in 2013 and actually escalated after President Nicolas Maduro succeeded him. Believing that he wouldn’t live up to the standards and expectations people had of Chavez, the US hoped it could easily get rid of him and regain control of the country. Attempts to do so started already in 2013, but Washington escalated this to a boiling point in 2019, when there was talk of imminent US invasion, particularly after ignorant warmongers started pressuring Trump to “intervene.” What occurred on January 3rd is a bizarre compromise between invasion and nothing.”
“Trump has been adamant about taking control of Venezuela’s oil since he was first elected, In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was “reversing the concessions” of the “oil transaction agreement, dated November 26, 2022” which refers to the Biden administration’s grant of a license to Chevron to operate in Venezuela. Delcy Rodriguez highlighted a fact on Venezuelan migration to the US when she said that “The US government has made a damaging and inexplicable decision by announcing sanctions against the US company Chevron. These kinds of failed decisions had prompted migration out of Venezuela.”
Trump implemented what he called “maximum pressure” sanctions against Venezuela in his first term. The Biden administration was also on the same path as Trump when he “reinstated broad oil sanctions, saying Maduro failed to keep his electoral promises” but he did not cancel Chevron’s license. This is just one more reason for the Venezuelan government to join BRICS, but the country’s dependence on the US will take a long time to be altered entirely. Once that happens, Trump’s future sanctions on Venezuela will be less effective. After Maduro’s capture, this is very unlikely. It should have tried to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization first.”17

Despite Trumps campaign rhetoric prior to his first and second administrations the US has not stopped operation as the world policeman and the tip of the spear for Pax Judaica whenever, wherever, and whoever they want it. As stated earlier, Neo-conservatism and Zionism are the same thing.18 How is this operation enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine when its at the behest of Organized Jewry and Israel? Jose Nino addresses the obtuse nature of this.

“The administration and geopolitical strategists sympathetic to Trump invoke the Monroe Doctrine to justify this escalation. Yet this appeal obscures a fundamental reality: Venezuela’s current alignment with extra-hemispheric adversaries such as Russia, China, and Iran represents not unprovoked aggression but a predictable response to decades of American economic warfare and destabilization efforts.
The irony is stark. Washington officials warn about foreign powers gaining influence in America’s backyard, seemingly oblivious to how their own interventionist policies pushed Caracas into precisely these arrangements. The more aggressively the United States confronts Russia, China, and Iran globally, the more these powers deepen cooperation with Venezuela. What American policymakers fear as a new Cuban Missile Crisis is rapidly becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, manufactured not by adversaries’ ambitions but by Washington’s own imperial overstretch.”19

I myself have addressed in a previous article as have others that the US has never stopped fighting the Cold War. Due to this, the entire Washington apparatus has kept their geopolitical paradigms in the 20th century while other powers like Russia, China, Iran and even India have adapted to the world as it is. This nonsensical hubris has cost the US dearly and will continue to do so in the future if nothing changes.20

Communism: Talk about a rank form of telling on yourself. The claim that Chavez and Maduro are Communists is like claiming George Lincoln Rockwell loved Jews and Blacks. Its conceptual illiteracy at its finest. Chavez and Maduro were categorically Social Nationalists, they call themselves this because National Socialism was tard and feathered during the 20th century. Dr. Johnson clears the air in regard to these misconceptions.

“Socialism of the 21st century is nothing less than National Socialism, not “socialism” in the abstract. “Socialism,” that is, Marxism and its cousins, is based on internationalism as its primary social category. One can't demand “national independence” while being a “socialist” at the same time. The media calls this the “pink tide” to make it seem like a victory for American liberals, yet its liberalism itself that's the stated target. Its a nationalist socialism that's winning and its terrifying the Left. As a generally neurotic, urbanized and delicate people, Leftists believe that if they label these movements in a way that makes them seem less threatening, they'll become more amenable to their agenda.
Socialism without nationalism doesn't make sense. Socialism for whom? On what basis? For what purpose? Marxism doesn't answer these questions. It doesn't try. It doesn't have the conceptual tools for it. It ends up making utilitarian arguments for the “greatest number.” Claiming abstract “working class” not only doesn't answer the question, but it also points to the fact that historically Marxist states had no connection to labor at all. It remains true, however, that so long as liberal democracies require politicians to run nationwide campaigns at great expense, they will be in the hands of the elite. Putting it in state hands changes nothing except the institutional setting. Its inherent to the system.”21

The social policies of Venezuela under Chavez and Maduro are as illiberal as one could find in the world. Pornography, Gay Marriage, Abortion, Transgenderism, and Prostitution are illegal or not recognized. Even contraception is highly regulated and reinforced via social pressures.22 Gee, sounds pretty BASED doesn’t it Anon! And if in fact the US ends up “running” Venezuela you can bet your sweet ass they will get all of the degeneracy mentioned above. Now you maybe saying: “Yea, but Venezuela is a third world shit hole.” This again is a product of conceptual illiteracy of the media, politicians, and academics and the self fulfilling prophecy that is US foreign policy.

“From 1999 to 2011, the poverty rate decreased from 44 percent to 26 percent and the rate of extreme poverty fell from 17 percent in 1999 to 7 percent in 2011. American sanctions have destroyed this. Importantly, the GINI coefficient, which measures wealth inequality, fell from 0.46 in 1999 to 0.39 in 2011. The GINI figure uses 0 to represent total equality, everyone having the exact same amount of wealth, while 1 is total inequality where one person would control all wealth. World inequality is expressed by the index at 0.38. The US is at 0.47, though this is understated since so much capital is spirited abroad and invested globally, its a meaningless figure. It’s likely more like 0.5 or higher. According to the UN, Venezuela held the lowest recorded GINI coefficient in Latin America. Today, that’s a pleasant memory only.
Land reform gave land to those who could till it. In total, Venezuela distributed more than 3 million hectares. In 1999, Venezuela was producing 51 percent of its own food, but that went up to over 70 percent in 2011. In total, food consumption increased 81 percent since 1999. Since 1999, the caloric intake of Venezuelans increased by 50 percent thanks to the creation of 22,000 food stores where products are subsidized up to 30 percent. Meat consumption increased by 75 percent since 1999. The malnutrition rate fell from 21 percent in 1998 to less than 3 percent in 2012 according to the FAO.
The nationalization of the oil company PDVSA in 2003 permitted the country to chart its own economic path. The creation of Petrocaribe in 2005 allows 18 countries in Latin America a secure energy supply, using oil subsidies of between 40 to 70 percent. Venezuela also provides assistance to disadvantaged communities in the United States by providing fuel at subsidized rates.
The nationalization of the electrical and telecommunications sectors allowed the end of private monopolies and guaranteed universal access to these services. Since 1999, more than 50,000 cooperatives have been created in all sectors of the economy. The unemployment rate fell from 15.2 percent in 1998 to just over six percent in 2012, with the creation of more than 4 million jobs. The minimum wage increased from 100 bolivars (roughly $16) in 1998 to 247.52 bolivars ($330) in 2012. This is the highest minimum wage in Latin America. In 1999, 65 percent of the workforce earned the minimum wage, but 13 years later, only 21 percent did. Working hours were reduced to 6 hours a day and 36 hours per week, without loss of pay.
Public debt fell from 45 percent of GDP in 1998 to 20 percent in 2011. Venezuela withdrew from the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, after they paid their long term debts early, as the Russians had done. In 2012, the GDP growth rate was 5.5 percent in Venezuela, one of the highest in the world. GDP per capita rose from $4,100 in 1999 to $10,810 in 2011. All of this is today a memory. Yet again, imperial liberalism has taken a nation on the verge of first world status and thrust it back to the third world or lower.”23

To reiterate, it is US sanctions that are the direct cause of Venezuelan migration to the US, devolution of their economy, and their turning to other powers for assistance. If you start reading a new book you don’t open up and start reading on page 80, we need to start the story at the beginning to get a real picture. Jose Nino again lays out the devastation the sanctions have caused. US foreign policy with any country that does not suck up and toe the line for Israel is one of pain and constant harassment. The relationship is akin to an alcoholic husband who repeatedly beats his wife and when she finally packs her bags he murderers her for daring to leave.

“To understand Venezuela’s current strategic partnerships, one must first grasp the systematic campaign that preceded them. Since 2005, Washington has imposed 12 distinct rounds of sanctions, creating one of the most comprehensive economic warfare campaigns in the Western Hemisphere. The United States currently maintains 431 sanction designations on Venezuelan individuals and entities, having sanctioned 81 individuals and 46 entities.
The humanitarian toll has been catastrophic. The 2017 financial sanctions and 2019-2020 oil bans strangled Venezuela’s export capacity, worsening the humanitarian crisis and triggering a mass migration exodus from the country. John Bolton candidly admitted these sanctions aimed at driving PDVSA’s production as low as possible to crash Maduro’s regime. When Western capital markets vanished under threat of secondary sanctions, Venezuela turned to nations willing to defy American financial hegemony—creating a de facto balancing coalition against Washington.”24

Narco-Terrorism: Of all of these copes this one is by far the most retarded. If you actually buy this line you’re not going to make it. Recall that just a few months ago the Trump Admin was claiming that Venezuela was responsible for Fentanyl trafficking, but I guess even this canard was too ridiculous to sell to the public so the line moved to cocaine. Sorry but I don’t think cocaine is the drug that has been tormenting the US for years.

Ironically, Trump recently pardoned the former President of Honduras Juan Hernandez for serious cocaine trafficking offences. Would it surprise you that Hernandez is a zealous supporter of Israel?

“During the presidency of Juan Orlando Hernández (JOH, 2014–2022), Honduras was known for large-scale drug trafficking and corruption, as well as for its severe human rights violations, especially targeting defenders of land, environment, and journalists. On November 28, 2025, President Donald Trump announced on social media that he would issue a “full and complete pardon” to Hernández, an announcement that immediately raised serious concerns given the gravity of Hernández’s convictions. Just three days later, on December 1, Trump formally granted the pardon, and Hernández was released that day. This abrupt reversal came despite Hernández’s 45-year sentence, issued in June 2024 after a U.S. federal jury found him guilty of conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and committing related firearms offenses.”25

Furthermore, the Trump Admin made up the name of a cartel that does not actually exist. Law enforcement and narcotics specialists have stated that there is no trace of this organization in Latin America. It appears that Cartel de los Soles was made up to bring charges against Maduro by whatever means necessary. An article from Common Dreams states the following.

“There’s a big catch with the impression created by the Trump administration’s narrative: Cartel de los Soles is not a literal organization, according to a range of specialists in Latin American criminal and narcotics issues, from think-tank analysts to former Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) officials.

It is instead a figure of speech in Venezuela, dating back to the 1990s, for Venezuelan military officials corrupted by drug money, they say. The term, which means “Cartel of the Suns,” is a mocking invocation of the suns Venezuelan generals wear to denote their rank, like American ones wear stars.

It is for that reason that the DEA’s annual National Drug Threat Assessment, which describes major trafficking organizations in detail, has never mentioned Cartel de los Soles. Nor has the annual “World Drug Report“ by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Nevertheless, the claim that Maduro was at the helm of an international terrorist cartel was a core justification the Trump administration has used over the past year to legitimize pushing him out of power.”26

Frens, I know you want wins and I know you want this to get better for us and our people; I’m right there with you. But we can’t be so desperate for a win that we’ll champion and dolphin clap slop like this. Yes, we need to Never BlackPill but that doesn’t mean becoming a gullible goyim at the drop of a tiny hat. False dialectics are everywhere and the world is very very grey. Be cautious Frens.

IN THE END, WE WILL WIN.